Rethink Pink, Part II: Carcinogens for the Cure

Everything goes pink in October for Breast Cancer Awareness Month. We are bombarded daily with pink products, armies of pink feather boa-clad women marching in Susan G. Komen’s Race for the Cure, and “Save the Boobies” bumper stickers. Turn on the TV, and every news anchor has a pink ribbon pinned to their lapel. Football fans surely can’t miss the giant pink ribbons painted across football fields or the pink cleats worn by the players. It’s all to raise awareness, right?

I think we’re all perfectly aware of breast cancer at this point though.

What does any of this pink stuff do to help women with breast cancer? In many cases, very little. But it does help companies to sell, sell, sell lots of pink products! And it gives consumers the warm, fuzzy feeling that buying some pink trinket is an act of activism, striking a blow against breast cancer.

There are many kind, good-intentioned people with a genuine desire to help end the breast cancer epidemic who buy pink products and participate in pink events like the Race for the Cure. Watching a loved one struggle with a devastating illness is incredibly frustrating, and one can feel powerless to help them, as the battle against the disease largely takes place inside their bodies. Pink ribbon culture externalizes that battle, using pugnacious language that refers to breast cancer as a battle that can be won.

Yet, as I concluded in last week’s post about breast cancer awareness, these causes aren’t really accomplishing a whole lot toward finding a cure or preventing women from getting breast cancer in the first place.Sadly, most “breast cancer awareness” buzz seems more and more to be nothing more than a pragmatic marketing scheme that is more beneficial for the retail industry than real women with cancer.

To my knowledge, “shopping for the cure” is not an effective treatment for breast cancer.

Sticking a pink ribbon on a product, or creating a “limited edition” pink version of a product, with the promise of donating a percentage of the proceeds to breast cancer charities has proven hugely profitable for both the companies and the breast cancer foundations. Susan G Komen, for example, has approximately 216 corporate sponsorships, from which the organization banks over $50 million per year. Retailers can charge a little more for a product, give a small percentage to a charity (or not, in some cases), and boost their public image by associating themselves with a charitable cause.

Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer, and the pink ribbon made it cute, girly, and appealing. Because most people have had friends or family members that have either survived or succumbed to breast cancer, it is a cause that has a hefty emotional pull for people of all races, genders and socioeconomic classes.

In a sad way, breast cancer is also highly marketable because of that old advertising adage: “sex sells.” Much of the marketing of breast cancer awareness focuses on breasts, not cancer. Breast cancer awareness tag-lines and campaigns often rely on double-entendres and innuendos to make breast cancer sexy and sell-able. Some messages are less subtle than others. A 7-11 in my neighborhood sells hot pink LiveStrong-esque wristbands that read “Save the Ta-Ta’s!” and “I Heart Boobies!”

The implication seems to be that the real tragedy of breast cancer is that there might be fewer breasts in the world, not that the women attached to them are dying.

Though it isn’t as common, I would be remiss if I didn’t point out the fact that men can get breast cancer too – about 2,200 men are diagnosed with breast cancer every year. The hyper-feminization of breast cancer means that men with breast cancer can feel marginalized and even emasculated. Their plight goes utterly ignored in the great public battle against breast cancer, since it’s been so heavily promoted as a “women’s issue.”

Pink Products That Stink

So, without further ado, let’s focus a critical eye on some of the products being sold in the name of breast cancer awareness. Some are just plain absurd, like this pink ribbon beer pong table.

Beer pong for the cure, bro.

Some are just plain ugly, like these NFL pink ribbon rain boots:

But what really makes my blood boil is that many of the products sold with the pink ribbon endorsement actually contain chemicals and toxins known or suspected to cause breast cancer.

Let’s take a look at a few glaring examples:

Promise Me perfume by Susan G. Komen

“Promise Me” is a perfume sold by the Susan G. Komen foundation last year. It sold for $59 a bottle, with a just a measly $1.31 of that retail price estimated to actually go to funding breast cancer research. If that weren’t enough to give consumers pause, how about the fact that the perfume contained known carcinogens?

The ingredients (unlisted on the label) included a hormone disruptor called galaxolide and toluene, a neurotoxin that has been banned in many countries over health concerns. Breast Cancer Action–an awesome organization working towards breast cancer prevention and exposing corporate “pinkwashing”—caught wind of the perfume, and successfully campaigned to have it taken off the shelves and reformulated to remove the offending chemicals.

KFC’s Buckets for the Cure

Perhaps most infuriating to us at the Gerson Institute was KFC’s 2010 “Buckets for the Cure” campaign, in which enormous buckets of greasy fried chicken were heavily advertised and sold, allegedly to help cure breast cancer.

The National Cancer Institute’s website says that “an increased risk of developing colorectal, pancreatic, and breast cancer is associated with high intakes of well-done, fried or barbecued meats.” But by KFC’s thinking, eating fried chicken is helping in the fight against breast cancer.

At the Gerson Institute, we prefer a different kind of “bucket for the cure!

Pink Your Drink

Studies have shown a strong correlation between women’s drinking habits and their risks of breast cancer. And yet, liquor companies are jumping on the pink ribbon bandwagon, producing pink liquors for breast cancer awareness . Many bars and restaurants also host “Pink Your Drink” nights that serve pink cocktails to “fight breast cancer.”

The website of the company that produces the pink ribboned vodka pictured on the right actually says:

“By purchasing SUPPORT HER VODKA, you can help in the prevention of breast cancer.”

I mean, come on. Give me (and your liver) a break!

Cosmetics and Skin Care Products

Beauty products are the ideal vehicles for pink ribbon placement, as they are stereotypically feminine and mostly bought by women. Women are the most likely demographic to buy pink products, breast cancer awareness or no. Plus, most nail polishes, blushes and lipsticks already come in a shade close to the “Pepto Bismol” hue most commonly seen on pink ribbon products.

Cosmetics and beauty products are also often the worst offenders in terms of harmful ingredients. Parabens, formaldehyde, sulfates, and countless other unpronounceable chemicals can be found on the labels of even the most benign-seeming products.

Beauty products often contain tons of nasty chemicals, most of which are meant to be applied directly to the skin. Approximately 60% of all substances sprayed, rubbed or applied to the skin are absorbed into the bloodstream. What you put on your skin has nearly the same effect as what you put in your mouth, and you certainly wouldn’t think of drinking a bottle of shampoo, right?

Always read the labels on any product, pink or not. If there are ingredients that you can’t pronounce, it’s a good bet that they’re not good for you. EWG’s Skin Deep Database is a wonderful site that lets you look up the ingredients of cosmetics, lotions, soaps and pretty much any other kind of skin care product to see if they pose any kind of health risk. (Note: the site appears to be down for maintenance at the moment, but the new and improved version should be up soon)

A few ingredients to steer clear of include:

  • Parabens. Parabens are hormone disruptors and linked to breast cancer and reproductive toxicity, among other health issues. The most common parabens to look out for are ethylparaben, butylparaben, methylparaben and propylparaben
  • Sulfates. Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (which is sometimes labeled under different names) is used as a foaming agents in shampoos and soaps, and is known as a toxin and irritant.
  • Antiperspirants Antiperspirants interfere with the body’s attempt to eliminate toxins from the lymphatic system through sweating.
  • Formaldehyde. Found in nail polish and nail polish remover, as well as hair straightening treatments like the Brazilian Blowout. Formaldehyde is quite toxic and can be carcinogenic.

When it comes to cosmetics and skin care products, a good rule of thumb is “don’t put anything on your skin that you wouldn’t put in your mouth.” Even products touted as “70% organic” or “made with organic ingredients” can have troublesome and undesirable ingredients.

If “Shopping for the Cure” isn’t going anywhere, then let’s change the conversation.

Let’s spend what remains of Breast Cancer Awareness Month (and beyond) educating ourselves and others about avoiding environmental toxins and making healthy consumer choices. Teach ourselves to be smart consumers, and how to avoid carcinogens and toxins that can cause or contribute to cancer. And isn’t prevention preferable to “early detection” anyways?

Mindless consumerism isn’t really doing much for the cause, but teaching people to avoid sources of environmental toxins is vital in the prevention of cancer.

This new kind of “shopping for the cure” might not be as beneficial to retailer’s profits as buying pink ribbon products, but much more beneficial for your own health and well-being.

That’s the kind of awareness we need to be raising.

Previously — Rethink Pink Part 1: Are We More Aware of “Breast Cancer Awareness” Than the Disease Itself?

This October, you don’t have to buy a pink plastic water bottle to make a stand against cancer. Find out how you can support the Gerson Institute’s work:
10 Ways to Support Nutritional Healing During Breast Cancer Awareness Month


Educational articles like this are made possible with your generosity. Help us continue the legacy of Dr. Max Gerson, his daughter Charlotte Gerson, and the thousands who rely on the Gerson Institute for vital educational materials and training.



21 Responses to “Rethink Pink, Part II: Carcinogens for the Cure”
  1. Hilary says:

    5 hour energy pink lemonade…..that one made me shake my head, for sure.

  2. S T Cook says:

    Great job Ally, very well done =)

  3. DJ says:


  4. lovemom says:

    Melaleuca have you heard of this company and their products. if so, what do you think?

  5. Lilsoulja says:

    it has become and will remain a powerful culture because it feeds on the fact that cancer is such an emotional event for many people. These companies will continue to “support” it as long as women and men buy into it. When watching the documentary “Pink Ribbon Inc.” it showed several women who participate in these functions because it makes them feel like they are doing something about it, not knowing what they really can do about it! Go Gerson!

  6. Lilsoulja says:

    it has become and will remain a powerful culture because it feeds on the fact that cancer is such an emotional event for many people. These companies will continue to “support” it as long as women and men buy into it. When watching the documentary “Pink Ribbon Inc.” it showed several women who participate in these functions because it makes them feel like they are doing something about it, not knowing what they really can do about it! Go Gerson!

  7. Woody says:

    Thank you for really opening my eyes,I just finished the Gerson Method book and found this site. It has forever changed my life and my lifestyle.

  8. Rose says:

    Let’s mention the fact that all these “pink” food products, like the little pink ribbon decorations on donuts from Dunkin’ Donuts are made with Red Dye, as well as probably every other pink food. Red dye #40 especially is linked to breast cancer! Makes me sick! Most people don’t know this and will buy these food products thinking they’re actually helping breast cancer when, in fact, if they’re ingesting them they are compromising their own health.

  9. Tanya Ryan says:

    I have felt this way for a very long time, and I don’t buy products on the market that are in the name of the Pink October. It isn’t that I don’t care, I am very much AWARE of breast cancer. I have family members who have died, and have survived this awful disease. I just don’t think that the products out there are REALLY helping to CURE breast cancer. Just a big hype for people to feel like they are doing something. I so agree with Ally; educating the public at large about how to avoid the things that are environmentally dangerous for us (both men and women) is a much better way to success.

  10. SarahG says:

    Thank you for this article. I have always been leery of the “pink ribbon” market BS,
    and have stayed away from it. I had stage 4 breast cancer.

  11. Jesse says:

    Great article, thank you for the truth!

  12. Eileen Morey says:

    Thank you for writing about what I’ve been thinking for years!! It’s time to do our own homework – read labels, clean up our diets and our lifestyles – and stop waiting for “the magic pill.” Stop making drug companies and questionable charities wealthy, while people continue to die, thinking they have no control. My first oncologist told me there was nothing I could to do affect my cancer by changing my diet and addressing other lifestyle factors. Fifteen years later, I’m here to tell you there absolutely IS! And I never went back to that oncologist, by the way.

  13. Jackie Goff says:

    I was also told by a specialist that my diet and lifestyle factors such as external toxins had nothing to do with me getting cancer. I will never be in that specialist’s office again, and I’m living in the solution. Thanks for all the information given…

  14. Andrea says:

    Thank you. This was enlightening 🙂

  15. konichiwa says:

    Vitamin D3 is what you need to be taking not just plain Vitamin D.

  16. Wow great to know all this as I’ve always suspected most of it myself, I never give money to this cause or buy products promoting it because I know that the money being raised mostly doesn’t end up doing anything to help the problem, and it’s not being used to help PREVENT only to fund the drug companies with more ways of treating it once it already exists, and it’s true that using some of the products they are selling could actually contribute to the cause of the breast cancer in the first place. My biggest beef about it is the anti-perspirants sold in Pink cans with Pink ribbons, containing aluminium and goodness knows what else, that actually stop a woman perspiring and block the lymphatic glands under the armpits and near the breast tissue, meaning that toxins can’t be excreted from the body in that area and therefore can accumulate in the cells causing the cell to become a cancerous lump instead of a healthy functioning cell. More money needs to be spent on educating people about the causes of cancer not brainwashing them into thinking that all the Pink Products are actually doing somenthing to help!

  17. Ruth Loffa says:

    I found a few of years ago here in Italy pink coffee makers….made in aluminium! 10% profit to an American cancer charity. I wrote to both the manufacturer and the charity regarding how inappropriate this was. I can’t let these things slide!!

  18. June says:

    Years ago I ran in a “pink ribbon” race. At the end of the race DIET SODA and ARTIFICIALLY SWEETENED, DYED YOGURT among other junk, cancer-causing foods were given away to us race participants. In that moment I knew something was very wrong. I have not supported pink ribbon anything since then. Watch the documentary “Pink Ribbons Inc.” Pink ribbons are all about making money for unethical corporations.

  19. Patricia M. Varga says:

    I ditto what Eileen Morey states below. We need to get to the root of the problem. Since our society is lazy and wants someone else to do their thinking this is where we are today. It is good to see these articles which offer true hope for a cure.

  20. 4brownz says:

    What about birth control pills? Does anyone think that taking hormones, maybe for decades, might be related to breast cancer? especially estrogen positive breast cancer?

  21. Jenine Grey says:

    Pardon me for saying that I don’t think our society is lazy just because they believe the hype about the pink ribbon,or think there is no cure for cancer, or believe fluoride is necessary in toothpaste, or think cow’s milk is nutritious, or things of that nature. It is a VERY intentional and strategic marketing scheme that many people, corporations, pharmaceutical companies, the FDA, the agricultural industry, news media, and trusted family doctors all participate in and promote. Yes, people need to do their own research. Like the many people who found this website. But remember that our society has been helped with this brainwashing.


We're on Facebook